Landscaping Government Contracts in Massachusetts

Federal Landscaping Services procurement in Massachusetts is unusually distributed: 10 cities share 46 active opportunities in Q3 2026, with the largest market — Unknown — holding just 33% of activity. The top 3 cities (Unknown, Barre, Hanscom AFB) collectively represent 52%. For contractors, this distributed pattern means opportunities are accessible from multiple geographic bases, reducing the risk of single-market dependency.

In Massachusetts's Landscaping Services sector, Unknown dominates with 15 active opportunities (33% of state volume) in Q3 2026, followed by Barre at 5 and Hanscom AFB at 4. The 3.0× gap between first and second place signals that Unknown has structural advantages — likely driven by proximity to major federal facilities or defense installations. Contractors should track how these rankings evolve seasonally, as federal fiscal year-end (September) often reshuffles city-level activity.

In Massachusetts, Landscaping Services procurement concentrates in two primary agencies: Department of the Army (51%) and Department of Veterans Affairs (26%). With 77% of 162 total awards between them and $11.2M in obligated spending, these agencies define the competitive landscape. Contractors should align their capability statements and teaming strategies to these agencies' acquisition preferences. On the vendor side, the market is incumbent-heavy: the top 3 contractors — DIVERSIFIED SITE SERVICES LLC, BROWN POINT FACILITY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, BUMBLEBEE LANDSCAPING LLC — hold 76% of recent awards, meaning new entrants face significant barriers unless targeting recompetes or set-asides.

Looking ahead, 3 Landscaping Services contracts in Massachusetts are entering recompete windows, valued at an estimated $111.7M combined. Of these, 3 carry high takeover signals — meaning the incumbent's position is vulnerable based on the agency's historical vendor switching patterns. For contractors planning their Massachusetts pipeline, these recompetes represent the highest-probability wins: existing requirements with defined scopes, incumbent performance data on record, and established funding lines.

Analysis computed from SAM.gov and USAspending.gov data · Updated daily

Computed from SAM.gov and USAspending.gov data · Updated daily